Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Wisconsin Community Services, Inc. v. City of Milwaukee

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 26, 2006No. 04-1966Published

1ConcurrenceEasterbrook, Circuit Judge

One question on which the parties have disagreed is whether 28 C.F.R. § 35.130(b)(7), which was promulgated under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, establishes an accommodation requirement in addition to the statutory rules that prohibit disparate treatment and limit disparate impact. The district judge said “yes,” the panel said “no,” and now the en banc court says “yes.” Having written the panel’s opinion saying “no,” see 413 F.3d 642, 646-47 (7th Cir.2005), I now join the en banc opinion saying “yes,” because further consideration has led me to conclude that the right…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hemisphere Building Company, Inc. v. Village of Richton ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  2. Wisconsin Community Services, Inc., and Wisconsin Correctional Service Foundation, Inc. v. City of Milwaukee, WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API