Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Soubral & Tucker

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 29, 1907No. 16,374PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-Seventh Judicial District Court, Parish of St. James, Paul Léehe, .Judge. Action by James A. Stewart against Sobral & Tucker. Judgment for defendants, and ■plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, C. J.

We have before us for •decision a question growing out of the claim •of James A. Stewart for $3,050 as commission on the sale of Oak Alley plantation, •owned at one time by the defendant partners. The price for which the plantation was sold was $61,000. Hotard and Pittman were the buyers.

One of the members of the firm, to wit, Mi-. Soubral, was on friendly terms with the plaintiff.

The plaintiff, while on his round of business, stopped for the night at the home in the country of Mr. Soubral. During the evening, while conversing with him, Soubral expressed himself as not pleased with his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Succession of FowlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1852
  2. Succession of KrekelerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892
  3. Beugnot v. TremouletSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mobley-Rosenthal, Inc. v. WeissLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Doll v. Albert Weiblen Marble Granite Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. McMahon v. BaenchLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API