Legal Opinion
Smith v. Smith
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 8, 1970No. 26001PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Justice.
This case is controlled by the decision rendered in Shoemake v. Whitlock, 226 Ga. 771, and the judgment of the trial court must be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
All the Justices concur. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Marion 0. Gordon, Courtney Wilder Stanton, Assistant Attorneys General, B. Daniel Dubberly, Jr., Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Lewis B. Slaton, District Attorney, Carter Goode, Tony H. Hight, for appellant. Jack Henry Smith, pro se.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Shoemake v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1970
- Stynchcombe v. ClementsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Hart v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- John L. Calhoun v. S. Lamont Smith, Warden, Georgia State Prison, Reidsville, Ga.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- John L. Calhoun v. S. Lamont Smith, Warden, Georgia State Prison, Reidsville, Ga., No. 71-1469 Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.