Chale Garza Investments, Inc. v. Madaria
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICKHOFF, Justice.
This appeal arises out of a wrongful foreclosure action. Summary judgment was granted in favor of appellees Alberto Cabe- zut Madaria and Arturo Cabezut Madaria (the “Madarias”). In four points of error, appellants challenge the summary judgment contending: (1) the summary judgment was improperly based on an agreement to which appellants did not consent; (2) the summary judgment was improperly based on an agreement consented to by appellee Berkeley Federal Bank & Trust, F.S.B. ffkja. First State Savings Bank (Of Delaware) (hereinafter “Berkeley Federal”), who was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Fandey v. Lee, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
- Diversified, Inc. v. Walker, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
- Griffin v. Rowden, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
- Henke v. First Southern Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Pinnacle Data Services, Inc. v. Gillen, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- Vogel v. Travelers Indemnity Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- Withrow v. State Farm Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
- Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1996
- MacQuarie Bank Ltd. v. KnickelDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.