Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Greber

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1978No. 172PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANDERINO, Justice.

Appellees, Greber and Gullick, were charged with several violations of the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, conspiracy, and corrupting the morals of a minor. Prior to trial, appellees sought to suppress certain physical evidence obtained by police at the time of, and subsequent to, their arrest. This is an appeal by the prosecution from an order of the trial court suppressing this physical evidence. The trial court held that the evidence was the product of an illegal search and seizure because appellees’ arrest was not based on probable cause. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. LAWSONSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. In re Adoption of NorwineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. People v. LuedemannIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. BanksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. LapiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. DanielsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. EspadaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API