Legal Opinion

Miller v. Holtz House of Vehicles, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Francis A. Affronti, J.

A legally unique and unprecedented motion now comes before this court wherein the plaintiff, Bradley P. Miller, seeks to vacate the notice for his physical examination, because the physician designated to perform the exam has a history of inflicting pain during his examinations. Dr. Austin *728R Leve, a board-certified orthopedic surgeon, who is the defendant’s designated physician chosen to perform the examination, has an extensive resumé, including 33 years of experience in the Rochester medical community. He has also held teaching and staff positions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Casali v. PhillipsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Hagmeier v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Newton v. CeasarCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API