United States v. Schipani
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WEINSTEIN, District Judge.
The Supreme Court, upon being informed by the Solicitor General that the defendant, Joseph F. Schipani, was a participant in a number of conversations which had been electronically monitored by agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and which led to the use of tainted evidence against the defendant, vacated the defendant’s conviction for income tax evasion, and remanded “the cause to the district court for a new trial, should the Government seek to prosecute * * * anew.” 385 U.S. 372, 87 S.Ct. 533, 17 L.Ed.2d 428. Following a detailed analysis…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re Franklin National Bank Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1979
- In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1983
- United States v. Louis J. Cella, Jr., Stephen R. Evans, Theodore Schiffman, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena of Alphonse PersicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.