Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cotterill

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 11, 1915No. Appeal, No. 12Published

Appeal, No. 12, March T., 1914, by plaintiff, from order of Q. S. Pike Co., Feb. T., 1913, discharging rule to strike off appeal in case of Commonwealth v. Albert Cotterill. Rule to show cause why an appeal from a summary conviction before a justice of the peace for violating the game laws should not be stricken off. The court in an opinion by Staples, P. J., discharged the rule. Error assigned was order discharging rule to strike off appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

There being no final judgment entered by the court below, for the reasons stated at length by Judge Porter in Commonwealth v. Luckey, 31 Pa. Superior Ct. 441, and by Rice, P. J., in Commonwealth v. Hesch, 58 Pa. Superior Ct. 426, the motion to quash this appeal is sustained.

The appeal is quashed.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LuckeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Commonwealth v. HeschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914