Legal Opinion

Little v. Burgess

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 20, 1941No. 8 Div. 92PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

Mrs. Irene Burgess filed her bill in equity, duly sworn to, in the circuit court, setting up that she is the widow of the. decedent, and that the other complainants are all of . his and her children; that Agnes Burgess Little, a sister, is the administratrix, named in the petition for letters of administration in the probate court, of decedent’s estate, and she is made a respondent, individually, and as administratrix, and the other respondents are those who were named in her petition for administration as the “heirs at law of said deceased, so far as that petitioner was…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Crawford v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Gilb v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Tygh v. DolanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  5. Ex Parte McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hanks v. HanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  2. Jacobs v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. Ex Parte PettusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Ex Parte FloydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  5. Little v. BurgessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API