Legal Opinion

Tabas v. Robert Development Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1972No. Appeals, Nos. 60 and 330PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Spaulding, J.,

These two appeals arise from the same cause of action and facts. On November 20, 1970, creditor appellees Tabas filed a complaint and confession of judgment with the Prothonotary of Philadelphia County based on a judgment note signed by all five appellants. The appellees’ attorney inadvertently failed to include an affidavit of nonmilitary service, as required by the local rules of civil procedure.1 On November 23, appellants Berman filed a petition to show cause why the judgment by confession should not be stricken off because of the failure to include said affidavit…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Binenstock TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Seifert v. KeatingMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. King v. NimickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
  4. Tallarico v. BELLOTTISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Arenstein v. JencksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vision Service Plan v. Pennsylvania AFSCME Health & Welfare FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Carberry v. Fleet, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1984
  3. Investors Consumer Discount Co. v. Caskey, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County1977
  4. Morrison v. Correctional Physician Services Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API