Glatt v. Adams
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Taylor
The plaintiffs brought suit for commissions in the sum of $540 for producing a buyer of certain premises. The trial judge held that the plaintiffs were not entitled to recover.
The evidence is substantially as follows: In January, 1920, the defendant, James Adams, listed the property known as 6806 Cornell avenue, Chicago, with the plaintiffs, Gf-latt and Price, for sale, requesting them to find a purchaser. They were duly licensed real estate brokers. On January 27, 1920, James Adams notified the plaintiffs that he would be willing to sell the property for $18,000, to be paid for as follows :…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fox v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Goodridge v. HolladayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
- Hersher v. WellsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
- Schulte v. MeehanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
- Joice v. NormanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Greenwald v. MarcusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
- Levit v. BowersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
- Consolidated Trading Corp. v. RothAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951