Legal Opinion

Glatt v. Adams

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 18, 1922No. Gen. No. 27,043PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Taylor

The plaintiffs brought suit for commissions in the sum of $540 for producing a buyer of certain premises. The trial judge held that the plaintiffs were not entitled to recover.

The evidence is substantially as follows: In January, 1920, the defendant, James Adams, listed the property known as 6806 Cornell avenue, Chicago, with the plaintiffs, Gf-latt and Price, for sale, requesting them to find a purchaser. They were duly licensed real estate brokers. On January 27, 1920, James Adams notified the plaintiffs that he would be willing to sell the property for $18,000, to be paid for as follows :…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fox v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Goodridge v. HolladayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
  3. Hersher v. WellsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
  4. Schulte v. MeehanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
  5. Joice v. NormanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Greenwald v. MarcusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  2. Levit v. BowersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  3. Consolidated Trading Corp. v. RothAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API