Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Butler

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 24, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Floyd District Court. — Hon. John C. Sherwin, Judge. Action to recover an amount alleged to be due by virtue of an agreement of settlement for services rendered by plaintiffs as attorneys. A judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The petition alleges that plaintiffs are attorneys and counsellors, and have been engaged in the practice of their profession at Charles City for more than ten years ; that about February, 1888, they were retained by defendant, and employed by him with reference to a claim he made against one Griffin, and with reference to agreements made and difficulties which might arise between him and Griffin ; that it was agreed that the compensation of plaintiffs should depend upon *634the amount which should be received by defendant on his claim ; that plaintiffs spent a large amount of time in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Westphal, Hinds & Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  2. Ordway v. SuchardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  3. McNulty v. EverettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Masten v. Indiana Car & Foundry Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Church v. J. F. Lacy & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  3. Newlove v. SternSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API