Tanner v. Bank of Fox Lake
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the court,
Ingraham, Justice.
In this case it appears that the defendants, on being informed that the first draft was not paid, sent the draft on which this action is brought to take it up. This would be a good consideration for the *400draft, if there was no fraud or misrepresentation used in obtaining it. Such is the defence set up by the answer. On the trial the judge charged “ that giving the check was no payment.” To this the defendants excepted. There was no error in such charge. It has never been held that the check of the party bound to pay is a payment, if the check is not paid.
It does…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Aupperle v. DohertyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1930