Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Meek v. Geneva

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 2017No. 2017 AP 01 0001Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHoffman, J.

{¶ 56} I concur in the majority's analysis and rejection of Appellant's arguments challenging the trial court's subject matter jurisdiction and Appellee's standing. I further concur in the majority's analysis and decision the trial court abused its discretion in applying the doctrine of laches to this matter. 1

{¶ 57} I respectfully dissent, in part, from the majority's final disposition. I would remand the matter to the trial court to determine whether Appellant was in contempt of court with regard to the STRS payment. I would enter a final judgment finding Appellant in contempt with regard…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Doran v. Preble Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API