Legal Opinion
Roland v. Ajamian
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 11, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to compel the determination of claims to real property, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), entered March 5, 2004, which, upon an order of the same court dated January 29, 2004, granting the motion of the defendants Sam Ajamian and Violet Ajamian for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them and denying their cross motion, among other things, for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against those defendants, is in favor of the defendants…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Bray v. CoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Rubeo v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Brand v. PrinceNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Giannone v. Trotwood Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ruiz v. GriffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Roland v. McGraimeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Sharp v. SharpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006