Legal Opinion

Moody v. Sanders

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1993No. AV92000082PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSELL, Judge.

Dr. Max Moody III petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the circuit court to grant his motion for partial summary judgment to limit Robert Lee Sanders’s recovery to $1,500 on a medical malpractice counterclaim filed in the small claims court.

The following facts are asserted in the petition for mandamus:

On May 14, 1990, Dr. Moody, a licensed dentist practicing in Tuscaloosa, filed a complaint against Sanders in the Small Claims Court of Tuscaloosa County, seeking $280 allegedly due and owing for dental treatment rendered in September 1989. Sanders filed an answer of denial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Hardy v. TaborCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  3. Prescott v. FurouzabadiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Owens v. Huffstetler CollegeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Phillips v. MontoyaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  2. B & J Embroidery & Monogram Co. v. Charlotte Graphics, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API