Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Abramms

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 23, 2006No. 04-P-1211PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGelinas, J.

After a jury trial in the Northampton Division of the District Court Department, the defendant was convicted under G. L. c. 269, § 2, of failing to obey the order of a police officer to disperse from an “unlawful assembly.” On appeal, the defendant argues that the phrase “riotously or tumultuously assembled,” set forth in the statute, should be read conjunctively with the term “unlawful assembly” to define the offense, and that when the judge omitted this phrase from his instructions, the jury were precluded from considering an essential element of the offense. In addition, the defendant…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. VacherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. McGheeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. ManzelliMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. CarterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  5. BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT v. ROBERT M. HAGOPIAN.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API