People v. Garrett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
To the extent that the defendant’s claims of ineffective assis*782tance of trial counsel involve matter dehors the record, they may not be reviewed on direct appeal (see People v Johnson, 64 AD3d 792 [2009]; People v Johnson, 59 AD3d 738 [2009]; People v Dallas, 31 AD3d 573, 574 [2006]). Insofar as we are able to review the defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the defendant’s trial counsel provided meaningful representation (see People v Henry, 95 NY2d 563, 565 [2000]; People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713 [1998]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]). Contrary to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. PhilpotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. CannonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. EverleAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2012
- People v. PhilpotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.