Legal Opinion
United States v. Alvin Randall Carroll
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided August 20, 1993No. 92-5658PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The government appeals, 18 U.S.C. § 3742(b)(2), the district court’s refusal to apply the cross reference provision of United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual, § 2K2.1(c)(2) (Nov. 1989), in calculating the sentence of the defendant, Alvin Carroll, who was convicted of felony possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). For the reasons stated below, we vacate the defendant’s sentence and remand for resen-tencing.
I
The facts presented in this appeal are straightforward. In the early morning hours of June 24, 1990, Baltimore City Police Officer Sloan and her partner were…
3Cases cited20 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. LombardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. SpeelmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Anthony D. Barber, United States of America v. David L. Hodge, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Wesley L. DawnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.