(PS) Expose v. Speiller
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LINDA ROSE EXPOSE, No. 2:21–cv–1035–TLN–KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IFP REQUEST AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO 13 v. DISMISS 14 JUDGE STACY SPEILLER, et al., (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, who proceeds without counsel in this action, requested leave to proceed in forma 18 pauperis (“IFP”).1 See
28 U.S.C. § 1915
(authorizing the commencement of an action “without 19 prepayment of fees or security” by a person that is unable to pay such fees). Plaintiff’s affidavit 20 makes…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.