Legal Opinion

State v. Rapp

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1971No. 37804PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewton, J.

Defendant, pursuant to a plea of guilty, was convicted of the offense of burglary. See State v. Rapp, 184 Neb. 156, 165 N. W. 2d 715. This is the second of two post conviction proceedings brought by defendant. At the time of his conviction, he was represented by counsel. It is now his contention that plea bargaining was entered into, that he was thereby assured of a lesser sentence than the one received, and that his counsel was ineffective. We affirm the judgment of the district court dismissing defendant’s motion.

The record discloses that defendant had been previously convicted of felonies…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RappNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. RaueNebraska Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BartlettNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. ShepardNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. HalseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Harold W. Rapp v. Charles L. Wolff, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  5. State v. HattenNebraska Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API