Legal Opinion
Dunlap v. Corbin
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided January 6, 1981No. CIV 80-599 PHX CAMPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUECKE, Chief Judge.
Max Anderson Dunlap, the plaintiff, has filed a complaint claiming that the defendant’s failure to provide him with a prompt trial on a formerly pending murder charge is violative of his sixth amendment right to a speedy trial.
The defendant, Robert Corbin, the Arizona Attorney General, has filed a Motion to Dismiss, alleging that the complaint fails to state a claim.
This action is commenced pursuant to Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1343(4). As there are no material facts in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Indep. Living Ctr. of S. Cal. v. Jennifer KentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Sully v. LungrenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994
- Rothstein v. Montana State Supreme CourtDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1986
- (HC) Chatman v. The State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.