Legal Opinion

Aberthaw Construction Co. v. Ransome

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 21, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

This case is before us by a reservation upon the bill and demurrer. The material allegations of the bill may be summarized as follows:

The respondent is the inventor and patentee of a “ new and useful building material of concrete or similar substance and cold twisted metal bars embedded therein combined.” In February, 1896, he assigned one half interest in the letters patent to one Smith, and subsequently he and Smith each assigned his interest to the Ransome and Smith Company, a California corporation, so that the latter became the sole holder of the patent. In March, 1896, this company,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boston Diatite Co. v. Florence Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Price v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Menard v. HouleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Barbour v. WeldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Choate v. LoganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API