Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1970No. Civ. 10097PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAMURA, Acting P. J.

The People seek a writ of mandate commanding respondent court to vacate an order made pursuant to section 1538.5 of the Penal Code suppressing certain evidence seized from the home of real party in interest (defendant).

An information has been filed charging defendant with three counts of receiving stolen property, count I with receiving a Magnavox color television set belonging to Mrs. Esther Hull, count II with receiving a Magnavox color television set belonging to Mr. Fritz Kupher, and count III with receiving certain power tools belonging to Enoch Wood. The items…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Skelton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. NagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. DurenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. ManningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. MedinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API