Legal Opinion

State v. Rogers

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 2001No. WD 58492PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL M. SPINDEN, Chief Judge.

Fredric Rogers appeals the circuit court’s judgment in which it convicted him of sodomy. His only complaint concerns a statement that a member of the venire, Jack Dreyer, gave during voir dire. Rogers’ attorney asked the venire whether any of them knew Rogers. Dreyer answered, “I’m not positive. I recently retired as a correction officer and [was] just [wondering] if I have had association with this individual.” Roger’s attorney responded, “If you had seen him or associated with him[,] do you know him personally?” Dreyer answered, “Personally, no.”

Rogers asserts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  2. State v. DowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State v. CrenshawMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. State v. ChildressMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Gill Construction, Inc. v. 18th & Vine AuthorityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State v. StanleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State v. BoydstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State v. NormanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API