Kenosha Professional Firefighters, Local 414 v. City of Kenosha
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1ConcurrencePatience Drake Roggensack, J.
¶ 44. (concurring). I agree with the majority opinion's conclusion that the peremptory writ issued April 27, 2006, did not dispose of the entirety of the Kenosha Professional Firefighters, Local 414, IAFF, AFL-CIO and Alan M. Horgen's (hereinafter collectively referred to as the firefighters) petition for mandamus to compel compliance with their open records request because it was not a final order with regard to the matrix scores they had requested.1 I write in concurrence because the lack of finality of the peremptory writ is the sole reason that this court should conclude that the January…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Edward L. Richardson v. Chuck Penfold and Edward DyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Sandwiches, Inc., D/B/A Suburpia Submarine Sandwich Shoppes, Plaintiff- Cross-Appellee v. Wendy's International, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Baumeister v. Automated Products, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Wambolt v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Hartman v. Winnebago CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.