Legal Opinion

Clapp v. Johnson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1936No. 26006. Department TwoPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought for the purpose of recovering damages on account of the conversion of a promissory note. The defendant filed an answer and cross-complaint in which he asked that one W. D. Platt be made a party. This request was granted over the objection of the plaintiff. The trial was to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which the court concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to damages in the sum of one dollar and the return of the note. From the judgment entered in accordance with the findings and conclusions, the plaintiff appealed.

The First…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lockit Cap Co. v. Globe Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Clark v. GrogerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Sutton v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. Fidalgo Island Shingle Co. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Contractors MacHinery & Storage Co. v. StewartWashington Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re KLSWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Paris American Corp. v. McCauslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  3. RS v. Department of Family ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Hovland v. Farmers Union Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Whatcom County v. SchumanWashington Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API