Legal Opinion

Enz v. Bowan

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 5, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The question at issue is the interpretation of the second codicil to the will of Catherine Ruchsman, deceased.

Testatrix had had five children by her first marriage and four by her second marriage. In 1911, when her will was executed, both husbands were dead. Of the children by the first marriage, Mary, John and William were living and Jacob and Catherine were dead, each leaving children. Of the children by the second marriage Louisa was living and Frederick, Philip and Anna were dead, the latter also leaving children.

By the will she gave to John a house and lot of the value of about $4,000,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. TuckerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1901
  2. Baldwin v. TuckerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
  3. Outcalt v. OutcaltNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clark v. CushingCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API