Legal Opinion

Harper v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 2, 1996No. A96A1028PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Harold R. Banke.

Antonio Harper was convicted of armed robbery and aggravated assault. On appeal, Harper challenges the trial court’s limitation on the scope of voir dire. Held:

Harper claims that the trial court abused its discretion in its conduct of voir dire because his trial counsel was not permitted to pose nine questions to prospective jurors. We disagree. Limitation placed on counsel in questioning during voir dire under OCGA § 15-12-133 lies largely within the sound discretion of the trial court, and appellate courts should not interfere with the court’s exercise of that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  2. Mills v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. Henderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Ganas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Childers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API