Legal Opinion

Hawker v. Hawker

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1933No. 1153PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKunkle, J.

Counsel have requested the court to consider the record in this case with care. We have done so. We have also considered the briefs which have been filed by counsel in support of their respective contentions. The questions presented for our consideration are questions of fact rather than law. There is a sharp conflict in the testimony on some of these questions of fact. Upon the oral argument as-well as in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error, the error chiefly relied upon is that the judgment of the trial court is against the manifest weight of the evidence.

The case is here on error…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gugle v. GugleOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Hepner v. HepnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Addison v. AddisonOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API