Maupin v. McCormick
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 51 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— 17 Ben. Mon., 488; Hicks vs. Shouse. CITED— 17 B. M., 483. 5 Monroe. CITED— 1 Bibb. 396; Kincaid vs. Higgins. 8 Johnson's R., 189 ; Thompson vs. Ketchum. 1 Com. R., 404; Bean vs. Page. $. G. Johnson’s Rep., 285. 1 Taunton, 347; Hogg vs. Smith et al. 1 Peters’ U. S. R., 455; Bank of Columbia vs. Hagan. Chitty on Contracts, 74. 5 Monroe, 8; Haggin vs. Williamson. 17 B. Mon., 486; Hicks vs. Shouse.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE WILLIAMS
delivered the opinioh op the court:
November 17, 1856, W. R. Maupin purchased land of Sami. Wilson, now dead, and, as part of the consideration, executed his note for four thousand eight hundred dollars, payable 17th of the following November, with interest from date, with this covenant in said note: “I am to have the privilege of extending the time of payment as long as I choose by paying interest thereon annually at the rate of six per cent’’
And, at the same time, Maupin purchased of Joseph Wilson land, and, as part of the purchase price, executed to him a note for two thousand…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kincaid v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1809
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stephens' Administratrix v. Union Central Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928