Legal Opinion

Newcomber v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 5, 1916No. 27643PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, Chief Justice

This action is brought by the executrix of Capt. Arthur B. Foster, deceased, to recover for the loss of certain property belonging to him, and is sought to be maintained under the *411provisions of the act of March 3, 1885, 23 Stat., 350. Capt. Foster was a quartermaster on duty with his regiment, Nineteenth Infantry, United States Army, at Ponce, Porto Eico. On May 16,1899, he went aboard the U. S. transport Meade, pursuant to orders from the colonel commanding the regiment, bound for New York, to refit for service in the Philippine Islands. The vessel was taken out of the harbor at night and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. Emery, Bird, Thayer Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Dooley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. United States v. HvoslefSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Thames & Mersey Marine Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  2. Maginnis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1917
  3. Andrews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1917
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1917
  5. Griffis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API