Legal Opinion

Chase v. Kaynor

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 14, 1889PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Cerro Gordo District Court. — Hon. Geobge W. Ruddick, Judge. Action to quiet the titles to lands. The facts appear in the opinion. There was a decree granting the relief prayed for in plaintiff’s petition. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

i. fobmbe aaonfy°part?e's stance.'111"

*4512. original cation7' basl’ for. ■’ *450I. The plaintiff claims title under Charles Felt, who conveyed the land by warranty deed to one Smith. The mesne conveyances to plaintiff were by quitclaim deeds. The defendant also claims under Felt, who by quitclaim deed conveyed the land to one under whom defendants’ ancestor claimed -title. The deed by Felt, under which plaintiff claims, was executed in 1858, and filed for record in 1869. The deed of Felt, under which defendants claim, was executed and filed for record in 1874. But defendants claim that their title is…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Lumber Co. v. Greene & Western Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Griffith v. Milwaukee Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  3. Wabash Railway Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. Frazer v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Schoening v. SchwenkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API