Legal Opinion

Baker v. Lockhart

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 21, 1986No. 85-293PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In July, 1985, appellant filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus in the trial court on the ground that he had been denied due process and equal protection of law by being twice denied release on parole. The trial court concluded that a writ of habeas corpus was not the proper remedy to challenge the parole board’s action and dismissed the petition. Appellant filed a notice of appeal and lodged the record. He now requests appointment of counsel.

The motion is denied and the appeal dismissed. A petition for writ of habeas corpus is restricted to the questions of whether the petitioner…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  2. Bargo v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Wallace v. WillockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Blevins v. NorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Nation v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API