Wildstein v. Gray

Smith, Judge.

Appellant sued for injuries allegedly sustained as a result of an automobile collision. From the denial of his motion for new trial after judgment was entered in his favor appellant appeals contending the court erroneously charged the jury and admitted evidence objectionable as irrelevant and "not the best evidence.” We find appellant’s contentions meritless and affirm the trial court’s denial of his motion.

*2231. The court charged, ”[T]he burden is upon the plaintiff to establish by a preponderance of the evidence just which of Dr. Wildstein’s damages and injuries or ailments…