Legal Opinion

State v. Brantley

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1996No. 18611PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ACOBA, Judge.

In this appeal by Defendant-Appellant, Mark A. Brantley (Defendant), we hold that the trial court did not err in admitting autopsy photographs of the murder victim involved and that there was sufficient evidence to convict Defendant of second degree murder on the basis of accomplice liability. However, we also hold that the sentencing court did err in sentencing Defendant to a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment under Ha-wai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 706-660.1(3)(a) (1993) for use of a semi-automatic firearm in the commission of a felony, because there was no trial finding…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dan v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. WellsHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. AntoneHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. IaukeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. SchroederHawaii Supreme Court · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. VanstoryHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. CornelioHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. BalberdiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State v. NorlinWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. KangHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API