Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Brazier v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 15, 1924No. 41PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). .The decision in Mahler v. Eby, 264 U. S. 32, 44 S. Ct. 283, 68 L. Ed. 549, filed some months after entry of order appealed from, settles some points.

The Secretary of Labor, proceeding under the Act of May 10, 1920. (41 Stat. 593), did not in this instance, any more than he did in the Mahler Case, make a formal finding that relators were “undesirable residents of the United States”; therefore this matter must take the same course as was directed in the decision cited.

But it is argued that because the act of 1920, does “no more than add to the list of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mahler v. EbySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Roberts v. . the StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1899

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Palermo v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  2. Blount v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Virginia · 2016
  3. (PC) Burton v. AryaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. (PC) Davis v. PamDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. (PC) Diaz v. HurleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API