Legal Opinion

Berg v. Zummo

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 2000No. 99-CA-0974PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

| TARMSTRONG, Judge.

This is a personal injury action arising from an altercation and a related truck-pedestrian collision near a bar. Several defendants were sued. The bar was sued by the plaintiff because it sold alcohol to a minor, who was involved in the altercation and the collision. The jury found the bar liable for a portion of the actual and punitive damages. The bar appeals as to liability. Because the record is totally devoid of evidence that the bar committed any affirmative act to increase the peril posed by the minor’s intoxication (assuming he was intoxicated), we must reverse…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thrasher v. LeggettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. PACCAR Financial Corp. v. HowardMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Curtis v. RomeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Godfrey v. Boston Old Colony Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Bourque v. BaileyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Berg v. ZummoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  2. Bonnie Romero v. Clarendon America Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Romero v. CLARENDON AMERICA INS. CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Romero v. CLARENDON AMERICA INS. CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API