Legal Opinion

Monette v. Estate of Patrick J. Murphy

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 2014No. 61212Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

On appeal, appellant first contends that he did not need to comply with NRS 147.040(1) because his legal malpractice claim would not diminish the decedent's estate. See Bell Brand Ranches, Inc. v. First Nat'l Bank of Nev., 91 Nev. 88, 91,

531 P.2d 471, 473

(1975). In particular, appellant contends that his claim, if successful, would be paid from proceeds of the decedent's professional liability insurance policy, which is not part of the decedent's estate. Respondents, however, counter that the insurance policy is subject to a $10,000 deductible, meaning that the first $10,000 of a successful…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gardner Hotel Supply of Houston v. Estate of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Bell Brand Ranches, Inc. v. First National Bank of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API