Legal Opinion
(PC) Gray v. Clark
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 23, 2022No. 1:20-cv-00196Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 THOMAS EUGENE GRAY, Case No. 1:20-cv-00196-JLT-SAB (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 11 MOTIONS FOR ATTENDANCE OF TRIAL v. WITNESSES 12 KEN CLARK, et al., (ECF Nos. 68, 69) 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 Plaintiff Thomas Eugene Gray is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 17 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motions for attendance of trial witnesses, filed 19 September 1, 2022, respectively. (ECF Nos. 68, 69.) Defendants filed an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Andrew John Walker, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. George W. Sumner, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Pascagoula Nat. Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank of AtlantaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1924