Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Page

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 19, 1988No. SCBD 3144Published

1ConcurrenceKauger, Justice

Under the controlling rule, 5 O.S. 1981 Ch. 1, App. 1-A, Rule 8, a lawyer who is the subject of an investigation or a pending proceeding involving allegations of misconduct may resign membership in the Oklahoma Bar Association at any time.1 Because Rule 8.2 uses the mandatory command “shall” in requiring this Court to enter an order approving the resignation of such a lawyer, we have been stripped of discretion concerning whether to approve proffered resignations under the rule.2

Several reasons have been propounded for the existence of Rule 8.2. The one most often voiced is that the Oklahoma…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of Reinstatement of KaminsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. CantrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. SamaraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Union Oil Co. of California v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Hair v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API