Legal Opinion

Balfour v. The Director

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided February 18, 1888PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.

This suit was brought by the libelants, Alexander Balfour, Stephen Williamson, Robert Balfour, Alexander Guthrie, and Robert B. Foreman, doing business in this port as Balfour, Guthrie & Co., against the British bark Director, her master, William D. Bogart, and 16,868 bags of wheat.

The libel prayed for process against said bark, wheat, and master, to the end that the first might be sold to pay the damages of the libelants; that the second “might be delivered to the libelants,” free of all charges and liens; that the master may be restrained from interfering with the wheat during the pendency…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Work v. LeathersSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. The ThamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Houseman v. Cargo of the Schooner North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  4. The TornadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. The Northern BelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1870

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Pehr UglandDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1921
  2. Colorificio Italiano Max Meyer, S.P.A. v. S/S Hellenic Wave v. Superintendence Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1904
  4. Colorificio Italiano Max Meyer, S.P.A., and Nymco, S.P.A. v. S/s Hellenic Wave, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Furniture, Etc., and Hellenic Lines Limited and Hansen & Tidemann, Inc. v. Superintendence Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API