Legal Opinion · Dissent

W.E. Pender & Sons, Inc. v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 15, 2009No. CA 08-403Published

1DissentMarshall, J.

Orders granting a new trial are as rare as hen’s 117teeth. Their rarity is reflected in the extraordinary deference we owe the circuit court in this situation. As our court recognizes, we review for an abuse of discretion. Among other things, discretion abused is discretion exercised thoughtlessly and without due consideration. E.g., Carlew v. Wright, 356 Ark. 208, 212, 148 S.W.3d 237, 240 (2004). Deferential in general, that standard of appellate review embodies a spectrum of more or less deference depending on the nature of the judgment call under review. Henry J. Friendly, Indiscretion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carlew v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Piercy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Rogers v. Frank Lyon CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  4. Roetzel v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API