Regan v. Borst
New York Court of Common Pleas
Action by John Regan against Christian E. Borst, the Hudson Realty Company, Paul Rosenthal, John F. Crotty, George Woerhle, Albert Woerhle, Simon E. Bernheimer, and Josephine Schmid to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Complaint dismissed.
1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.
None of the parties other than those above named appeared in the action, which was brought to foreclose a *811mechanic’s lien tin the premises on the northwest comer of Third avenue and 118th street The only party really defending was the Hudson Realty Company, who was the owner of the premises in question. On or about the 12th day of April, 1893, this company, made a lease of the premises to the defendant Christian E. Borst for a term of five years from the 1st day of May, 1893, at a rental of §5,000 a year. Before the occupation of these premises by Borst, they had been used for a hat store.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burkitt v. . HarperNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Otis v. . DoddNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Schmalz v. . MeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Spruck v. . McRobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Cowen v. . PaddockNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.