Legal Opinion

Shomo v. Zeigler

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County

Decided April 13, 1874Published

Rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion delivered 13 April, 1874, by

Walker, J.

There are four reasons assigned for a new trial, viz. :

1. The verdict was against the law and the-evidence.

2. The court erred in its construction of the agreement of the 26th February, 1863.

3. The jury were improperly interfered with.

4. That papers were sent out with the jury that were not in evidence, to wit, the entire record in bankruptcy, including depositions that had been previously refused the defendant to use.

As to the first reason : There were disputed facts in this case, such as the defendant’s possession, the wife’s title, and other…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Marine Ins. Co. of Alexandria v. HodgsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Pettibone v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1840
  3. People v. BoggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Taber v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1839
  5. Leber v. KauffeltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API