West Broad Chiropractic v. American Family Insurance
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentMoyer, C.J.
{¶ 36} I dissent from the judgment because I find the assignment between Kristy Norregard and West Broad Chiropractic (“West Broad”) to be enforceable. Therefore I would hold that West Broad should be permitted to recover from American Family Insurance for its failure to pay West Broad pursuant to the assignment. Additionally, I would hold that R.C. 3929.06 does not prohibit an assignee of an injured person from filing suit to collect from the insurer on the assignment when the insurer has disregarded the assignment while distributing settlement proceeds.
I
Assignment of the right to contingent…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. First of Georgia InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- Hernandez v. Suburban Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Achrem v. Expressway Plaza Ltd. PartnershipNevada Supreme Court · 1996
- MedCorp, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Job & Family ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Midtown Chiropractic v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.