Legal Opinion

State v. Rose

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 8, 2011No. 28403-4-IIIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*31¶1 The primary question presented in this appeal is whether an inactivated credit card that requires a payment to become activated constitutes an access device. We conclude that it does. In the unpublished portion of this opinion we consider additional issues and affirm the convictions.

Korsmo, A.C.J.

FACTS1

¶2 Douglas Rose was arrested September 16, 2008. A search incident to arrest produced methamphetamine and what appeared to be an unactivated credit card in the name of Ruth Georges. In addition to Ms. Georges’ name, the plastic card had an account number, a sticker with activation…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. DelmarterWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Bostain v. Food Express, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RoseWashington Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API