Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Artuz

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 16, 1994No. 94 Civ. 1862 (GLG)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOETTEL, District Judge.

Dennis Simpson has filed a petition for habeas corpus challenging his conviction in Westchester County Court on July 30, 1981, on a charge of criminal facilitation. Respondents argue that we lack jurisdiction to hear this case because Simpson’s one-year sentence on his criminal facilitation conviction has expired, having been merged with a longer, indeterminate sentence Simpson received in a separate grand larceny proceeding in Westchester County Court. Respondents also argue that Simpson’s claims are without merit. We do not reach the substantive arguments…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. William E. Crank v. Jack R. Duckworth, Warden, and the Attorney General of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Derek Sloane v. Michael DayeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API