Legal Opinion

Aagesen v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 26, 1994No. TP-92011; CA A77727Published

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

In this third-party distribution case, claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that SAIF is entitled to a share of the settlement in claimant’s legal malpractice claim. We affirm the Board.

Claimant was compensably injured and received benefits from SAIF. He pursued a third-party action against a negligent third party and settled that action for $50,000, with SAIF’s approval. SAIF received a portion of the settlement under ORS 656.593. Claimant then brought a legal malpractice claim against the attorney who had represented him in the third-party case. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gardner v. MeilingOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Rushlight Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Toole v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Toole ex rel. Professional Liability Fund v. EBI CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API