Legal Opinion
In re Conrad
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 9, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Catherine M. Conrad was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on January 26, 2000, and, at all times relevant to this proceeding, has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
In a previous order dated December 18, 2007 (48 AD3d 187), this Court suspended respondent from the practice of law for failure to respond to requests made by the Departmental Disciplinary Committee pursuant to its investigation of two complaints made against her (22 NYCRR 603.4 [e] [1] [i]). After…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- In re SupinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re FuscoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re ConradAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re StewartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
4Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. DaugerdasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Matter of SolowayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Matter of SolowayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022